PJM interconnection queue: capacity, states and timing
The PJM interconnection queue in the FieldProspects database lists 1,492 planned power projects totalling 260.3 GW, against an operating PJM fleet of 4,056 projects and 230 GW. Solar leads the planned pipeline with 884 entries and 96.4 GW, and Virginia is the largest state at 63 GW.
Data as of
What is the PJM interconnection queue?
The PJM interconnection queue is the waiting list of generation and storage projects that have applied to connect to the grid run by PJM Interconnection. A project stays on the list while its connection is studied, and leaves it by being built or by dropping out.
PJM planned and operating projects
PJM's planned pipeline, at 260.3 GW, is 1.1 times the 230 GW of operating capacity that Form EIA-860M lists on the PJM grid. Of the 1,492 planned entries, 1,109 come from the PJM interconnection queue and 383 are planned units from federal generator filings.
Solar accounts for 37% of planned capacity. Natural gas has only 125 entries, but among entries that state a capacity they average 569.6 MW against 109 MW for solar, which brings gas to 71.2 GW. Nuclear has 11 entries at 22.7 GW and battery storage 246 at 38.5 GW. Hydro shows 90 entries but just 385.9 MW, so counts and capacity can point different ways.
| Planned projects | 1,492 |
|---|---|
| Planned capacity | 260.3 GW |
| Operating projects | 4,056 |
| Operating capacity | 230 GW |
| Planned projects with a developer attributed | 36% (537 of 1,492) |
| Operating projects with a developer attributed | 8.2% (331 of 4,056) |
| Technology | Planned projects | Planned capacity | Operating projects | Operating capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solar | 884 | 96.4 GW | 1,404 | 19.3 GW |
| Natural Gas | 125 | 71.2 GW | 987 | 108.2 GW |
| Battery Storage | 246 | 38.5 GW | 44 | 685.9 MW |
| Nuclear | 11 | 22.7 GW | 32 | 35.4 GW |
| Wind | 46 | 15.3 GW | 140 | 12 GW |
| Solar + Storage (Hybrid) | 77 | 9.4 GW | None | None |
| Other | 7 | 3.9 GW | None | None |
| Coal | 3 | 2.4 GW | 96 | 38 GW |
| Hydro | 90 | 385.9 MW | 311 | 8.4 GW |
| Oil | 1 | 50 MW | 495 | 5.8 GW |
| Biomass | 2 | 30.1 MW | 48 | 909.2 MW |
| Municipal Solid Waste | None | None | 19 | 720.8 MW |
| Landfill Gas | None | None | 476 | 409.6 MW |
| Petroleum Coke | None | None | 3 | 195 MW |
| Waste Heat | None | None | 1 | 11.2 MW |
| All technologies | 1,492 | 260.3 GW | 4,056 | 230 GW |
PJM projects by state
Virginia leads with 362 projects and 63 GW, 24.2% of planned PJM capacity. Illinois follows with 50.2 GW and Ohio with 41.5 GW. Pennsylvania has 273 entries, more than Ohio, but 25 GW, well under Ohio's capacity. The eight states shown hold 94.2% of the total.
| State | Projects | Capacity | Share of capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | 362 | 63 GW | 24.2% |
| Illinois | 195 | 50.2 GW | 19.3% |
| Ohio | 178 | 41.5 GW | 15.9% |
| Indiana | 133 | 29.3 GW | 11.3% |
| Pennsylvania | 273 | 25 GW | 9.6% |
| New Jersey | 74 | 14.4 GW | 5.5% |
| West Virginia | 60 | 14 GW | 5.4% |
| Kentucky | 95 | 7.9 GW | 3% |
When PJM projects are expected in service
Of the 1,492 planned PJM projects, 413 carry an expected year earlier than 2026 and 262 carry no date. That is 675 projects, 45.2% of the pipeline and 128.8 GW of capacity, with no usable future date.
Among the dated projects, 2027 is the peak year, with 230 projects and 34.6 GW. The year rows below cover only the dated future entries, so they understate the queue and should not be read as a forecast of what will arrive.
| Expected in-service year | Projects | Capacity | Share of capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before 2026, still listed as planned | 413 | 63.5 GW | 24.4% |
| 2026 | 186 | 18.6 GW | 7.1% |
| 2027 | 230 | 34.6 GW | 13.3% |
| 2028 | 179 | 25.5 GW | 9.8% |
| 2029 | 112 | 24.5 GW | 9.4% |
| 2030 | 63 | 14.5 GW | 5.6% |
| 2031 | 43 | 10.8 GW | 4.1% |
| 2032 | 4 | 3 GW | 1.1% |
| No expected date | 262 | 65.3 GW | 25.1% |
| All planned projects | 1,492 | 260.3 GW | 100% |
The five largest planned PJM entries
Every one of the five largest entries is above 2.5 GW, and the largest shown is 2.7 GW. Names are shown as the source lists them, and some, such as Salem 500kV and Braidwood 345 kV, read as connection points rather than plant names.
| Entry name | Capacity |
|---|---|
| Peach Bottom Units #2 & #3 | 2.7 GW |
| Salem 500kV | 2.7 GW |
| Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) Commercial Project | 2.6 GW |
| Braidwood 345 kV | 2.6 GW |
| Byron 345 kV | 2.5 GW |
What the database adds for PJM
A developer is attributed on 36% of planned PJM projects (537 of 1,492) and 8.2% of operating ones. The other 955 planned rows have no developer attributed in the database, so any developer count for PJM is a floor.
Each PJM row carries its county and status, and the database links attributed developers to the contacts at their companies, so a PJM search can end with a named company and the people there.
Source. PJM interconnection queue and U.S. Energy Information Administration Form EIA-860M, compiled by FieldProspects.
Related pages
- Interconnection queues Queue summaries for ERCOT, PJM, MISO and CAISO, with planned capacity and technology mix.
- CAISO Planned and operating projects on the CAISO grid, by technology, state and in-service year.
- ERCOT Planned and operating projects on the ERCOT grid, by technology, state and in-service year.
- MISO Planned and operating projects on the MISO grid, by technology, state and in-service year.
- Coverage rates How complete each field is, table by table, including where developer attribution is thin.
- Developers and IPPs Track competing pipelines and the queues you are entering, with the people at each company.
- Battery storage Planned and operating battery storage in the database, by state, grid and in-service year.
- Who is building data centers Data center developers ranked by number of projects and known capacity.
- FieldProspects vs Cleanview A dated comparison of what each product costs and includes, using only public information.
- About What FieldProspects is, what is in the database, and where the data comes from.