FieldProspects
MISO interconnection queue

MISO interconnection queue: solar, gas and storage in the pipeline

The MISO interconnection queue in the FieldProspects database lists 1,684 planned power projects totalling 301.4 GW, compared with 217.3 GW already operating on the MISO grid. Solar dominates the pipeline with 839 entries and 130.4 GW, well ahead of natural gas and battery storage.

Data as of

What is the MISO interconnection queue?

The MISO interconnection queue is the record of generation and storage projects that have requested a connection to the grid run by the Midcontinent Independent System Operator. Each entry is studied for its effect on the grid, and the list shows what developers want to build across the central United States.

MISO planned and operating projects

Solar is 43.3% of planned MISO capacity. Natural gas is second at 51.3 GW from 142 entries, which would add about 60.4% to the 85 GW of gas already operating. Battery storage has 280 entries and 45.9 GW, against only 1.2 GW operating today, and wind adds 36.9 GW.

Hybrid projects that pair generation with storage are tracked as their own technologies and account for another 116 entries and 22.8 GW. Coal is almost absent from the new pipeline, with 1 planned entry of 10 MW against 47.5 GW in operation. Of the 1,684 planned entries, 1,357 come from the MISO interconnection queue and 327 are planned units from federal generator filings.

MISO at a glance
Planned projects 1,684
Planned capacity 301.4 GW
Operating projects 5,027
Operating capacity 217.3 GW
Planned projects with a developer attributed 32.8% (552 of 1,684)
Operating projects with a developer attributed 7% (353 of 5,027)
MISO projects by technology
TechnologyPlanned projectsPlanned capacityOperating projectsOperating capacity
Solar 839 130.4 GW 1,388 24.4 GW
Natural Gas 142 51.3 GW 1,076 85 GW
Battery Storage 280 45.9 GW 42 1.2 GW
Wind 188 36.9 GW 429 33.7 GW
Solar + Storage (Hybrid) 99 18.9 GW None None
Transmission 77 11.4 GW None None
Wind + Storage (Hybrid) 6 1.7 GW None None
Nuclear 4 1.6 GW 14 13.1 GW
Hybrid (Other) 9 1.5 GW None None
Other 7 929 MW 13 313.2 MW
Solar + Wind + Storage (Hybrid) 2 750 MW None None
Hydro 16 151.8 MW 632 4.9 GW
Diesel 3 29 MW None None
Waste Heat 3 24.5 MW 13 322.3 MW
Oil 7 22.6 MW 972 3.5 GW
Coal 1 10 MW 118 47.5 GW
Landfill Gas 1 1.6 MW 209 273.4 MW
Biomass None None 99 1.9 GW
Petroleum Coke None None 10 1.1 GW
Municipal Solid Waste None None 12 152 MW
All technologies 1,684 301.4 GW 5,027 217.3 GW

MISO projects by state

Illinois has the largest planned pipeline with 316 projects and 46.6 GW, and Michigan follows at 44.2 GW. Louisiana and Arkansas come next at about 33.3 GW each, and Arkansas ranks above Indiana on capacity even though Indiana has more entries, 168 against 149. The eight states shown hold 85.2% of planned MISO capacity.

Top states by planned MISO capacity
StateProjectsCapacityShare of capacity
Illinois 316 46.6 GW 15.5%
Michigan 258 44.2 GW 14.7%
Louisiana 156 33.3 GW 11.1%
Arkansas 149 33.3 GW 11.1%
Indiana 168 29.9 GW 9.9%
Wisconsin 158 27.3 GW 9.1%
Minnesota 151 22.6 GW 7.5%
Iowa 110 19.5 GW 6.5%

When MISO projects are expected in service

567 planned MISO entries, 33.7% of the list and 87 GW, carry an expected year earlier than 2026. They are still listed as planned, so the expected date has passed without the project entering service. A further 6 carry no date.

Among entries still expected to come online, 2026 has the most, 323, but 2028 holds the most capacity at 64.1 GW across 294 projects. Only 17 entries are expected after 2030, so the dated list is a near-term view.

Planned MISO projects by expected in-service year
Expected in-service yearProjectsCapacityShare of capacity
Before 2026, still listed as planned 567 87 GW 28.9%
2026 323 42.7 GW 14.2%
2027 285 46.2 GW 15.3%
2028 294 64.1 GW 21.3%
2029 77 16.1 GW 5.3%
2030 115 39 GW 12.9%
2031 15 3.6 GW 1.2%
2034 2 1 GW 0.3%
No expected date 6 1.7 GW 0.6%
All planned projects 1,684 301.4 GW 100%

The five largest planned MISO entries

MISO does not publish a project name for many of its entries, so they carry the name of their connection point, such as a substation or a transmission line. Only one of these five, Vista Sands Solar, reads as a project name. The largest, at 2.2 GW, is 12.3 times the average of 180 MW among planned entries that state a capacity.

Large planned MISO entries by capacity
Entry nameCapacity
SIOUX 2.2 GW
Sugar Creek - Cayuga CT 345.0kV 1.5 GW
Majestic-Milan 345 kV Line 1.4 GW
North Madison 345/138 kV 1.2 GW
Vista Sands Solar 1.2 GW

What the database adds for MISO

Because many MISO entries are named for a connection point, the county and the developer are what place an entry on the ground. A developer is attributed on 32.8% of planned MISO projects (552 of 1,684) and 7% of operating ones.

The database adds the county to each entry and, where a developer is attributed, links the company to the contacts who work there.

Source. MISO interconnection queue and U.S. Energy Information Administration Form EIA-860M, compiled by FieldProspects.